Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 99.0% on the actual outcome vs market 97.9%).
Stand Out Games
Structural deviation compares our blended odds view (market + statistical explorer features) against market probabilities. Only games with max |Δ| of 0.5% or higher are shown.
Value pick performance (finished games)
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 99.0% on the actual outcome vs market 97.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 99.0% on the actual outcome vs market 97.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 99.0% on the actual outcome vs market 97.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 99.0% on the actual outcome vs market 97.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 99.0% on the actual outcome vs market 97.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.2% (assigned 91.1% on the actual outcome vs market 90.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.2% (assigned 91.9% on the actual outcome vs market 90.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.2% (assigned 91.9% on the actual outcome vs market 90.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.2% (assigned 91.9% on the actual outcome vs market 90.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.2% (assigned 91.9% on the actual outcome vs market 90.9%).
Market was closer to the result by 0.8% (market 6.3% on actual outcome vs our 6.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 93.2% on the actual outcome vs market 92.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 93.2% on the actual outcome vs market 92.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 93.2% on the actual outcome vs market 92.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 93.2% on the actual outcome vs market 92.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 93.2% on the actual outcome vs market 92.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 93.3% on the actual outcome vs market 92.5%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 93.7% on the actual outcome vs market 92.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 93.8% on the actual outcome vs market 93.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.1% on the actual outcome vs market 93.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.1% on the actual outcome vs market 93.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.1% on the actual outcome vs market 93.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.1% on the actual outcome vs market 93.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.1% on the actual outcome vs market 93.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.1% on the actual outcome vs market 93.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 94.8% on the actual outcome vs market 94.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 94.9% on the actual outcome vs market 94.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.2% on the actual outcome vs market 94.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our content is provided for informational purposes only we do not offer betting advice and accept no responsibility for any betting decisions or losses.
Live Profit Progression
Cumulative flat-stake performance across finished value picks.
No finished value-pick data available yet.
Full History Log
| Date | Match | Selection | Odds | Outcome |
|---|
No data found
Brighton & Hove Albion
Chelsea
Blau-Weiß Linz
Wolfsberger AC
Liverpool
Paris Saint Germain
Sparta Rotterdam
PSV
Fulham
Cercle Brugge
La Louvière
Palermo
Catanzaro
Valencia
FC Barcelona
Espanyol
Athletic Club
Newcastle United
AFC Bournemouth
Falkirk
Motherwell
Argentina
Cape Verde Islands
Rosenborg
Aalesund
Hamburger SV
SC Freiburg
Rangers
Hibernian
Atlético Madrid
Celta de Vigo
Qatar
Switzerland
Epitsentr Dunayivtsi
Polissya Zhytomyr
Manchester United
Leeds United
Strasbourg
Toulouse
Empoli
Avellino
Sporting Charleroi
Westerlo
Viborg FF
Sønderjyske Fodbold
Elche
Vitória Guimarães
Casa Pia
Hull City
Norwich City
Ceuta
Albacete
Huesca
Real Sociedad II
LASK Linz
Salzburg
Cesena
Calcio Padova
Blackburn Rovers
Leicester City
Sheffield Wednesday
West Bromwich Albion
Cagliari
Atalanta
Nordsjælland
Aston Villa
Zagłębie Lubin
Nieciecza
Hajduk Split
Osijek
Eyüpspor
Gaziantep F.K.
Antwerp
OH Leuven
Granada
FSV Mainz 05
Västerås SK
IFK Göteborg
Sarpsborg 08
Molde
AC Milan
Córdoba
Deportivo Alavés
Beşiktaş
Trabzonspor
HamKam
Vålerenga
Zulte-Waregem