Our model was closer to the result by 3.8% (assigned 88.5% on the actual outcome vs market 75.0%).
Stand Out Games
Structural deviation compares our blended odds view (market + statistical explorer features) against market probabilities. Only games with max |Δ| of 0.5% or higher are shown.
Value pick performance (finished games)
Our model was closer to the result by 3.6% (assigned 88.9% on the actual outcome vs market 75.6%).
Market was closer to the result by 17.9% (market 15.0% on actual outcome vs our 6.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.6% (assigned 89.0% on the actual outcome vs market 75.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.7% (assigned 89.0% on the actual outcome vs market 75.8%).
Market was closer to the result by 18.5% (market 16.4% on actual outcome vs our 7.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.5% (assigned 89.1% on the actual outcome vs market 75.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.6% (assigned 89.1% on the actual outcome vs market 76.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.5% (assigned 89.2% on the actual outcome vs market 76.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.5% (assigned 89.2% on the actual outcome vs market 76.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.5% (assigned 89.3% on the actual outcome vs market 76.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.5% (assigned 89.3% on the actual outcome vs market 76.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.4% (assigned 89.4% on the actual outcome vs market 76.5%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.2% (assigned 89.8% on the actual outcome vs market 77.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.2% (assigned 89.8% on the actual outcome vs market 77.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.2% (assigned 89.9% on the actual outcome vs market 77.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.1% (assigned 90.1% on the actual outcome vs market 77.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.1% on the actual outcome vs market 77.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.2% (assigned 90.1% on the actual outcome vs market 77.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.1% (assigned 90.6% on the actual outcome vs market 78.1%).
Market was closer to the result by 17.7% (market 15.0% on actual outcome vs our 6.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.2% on the actual outcome vs market 77.7%).
Market was closer to the result by 20.7% (market 21.5% on actual outcome vs our 9.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.2% on the actual outcome vs market 77.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.2% on the actual outcome vs market 77.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.1% (assigned 90.4% on the actual outcome vs market 78.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.1% (assigned 90.4% on the actual outcome vs market 78.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.5% on the actual outcome vs market 78.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.5% on the actual outcome vs market 78.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.0% (assigned 90.6% on the actual outcome vs market 78.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.9% (assigned 90.6% on the actual outcome vs market 78.5%).
Market was closer to the result by 17.5% (market 14.7% on actual outcome vs our 6.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.9% (assigned 90.8% on the actual outcome vs market 78.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.8% (assigned 90.9% on the actual outcome vs market 78.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.7% (assigned 91.1% on the actual outcome vs market 79.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.7% (assigned 91.1% on the actual outcome vs market 79.3%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.8% (assigned 91.3% on the actual outcome vs market 79.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.6% (assigned 91.5% on the actual outcome vs market 79.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.5% (assigned 91.8% on the actual outcome vs market 80.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.4% (assigned 91.8% on the actual outcome vs market 80.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.5% (assigned 91.9% on the actual outcome vs market 80.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.3% (assigned 92.1% on the actual outcome vs market 81.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.2% (assigned 92.1% on the actual outcome vs market 81.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.2% (assigned 92.1% on the actual outcome vs market 81.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.3% (assigned 92.3% on the actual outcome vs market 81.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.2% (assigned 92.5% on the actual outcome vs market 81.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.1% (assigned 92.5% on the actual outcome vs market 81.8%).
Market was closer to the result by 15.5% (market 11.7% on actual outcome vs our 4.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.1% (assigned 92.7% on the actual outcome vs market 82.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.1% (assigned 92.7% on the actual outcome vs market 82.2%).
Our content is provided for informational purposes only we do not offer betting advice and accept no responsibility for any betting decisions or losses.
Live Profit Progression
Cumulative flat-stake performance across finished value picks.
No finished value-pick data available yet.
Full History Log
| Date | Match | Selection | Odds | Outcome |
|---|
No data found
Ipswich Town
Queens Park Rangers
Angers SCO
Paris Saint Germain
Castellón
Cádiz
Olympique Marseille
Metz
Sheffield Wednesday
Galatasaray
Kocaelispor
FC Barcelona
Celta de Vigo
Dinamo Zagreb
Osijek
Estrela Amadora
Sporting CP
Venezia
Calcio Padova
FC København
Vejle Boldklub
Rangers
Aberdeen
Estoril
Benfica
FC Bayern München
Borussia Mönchengladbach
Senegal
Iraq
Kristiansund
Bodø / Glimt
Lens
Gil Vicente
Porto
Moreirense
Kudrivka
Shakhtar Donetsk
Hammarby
Halmstad
Rayo Vallecano
Deportivo La Coruña
Leganés
Real Madrid
Deportivo Alavés
FC Twente
FC Volendam
Larne
Tre Fiori
Obolon'-Brovar
Bohemians
St Josephs FC
Vitória Guimarães
Metalist 1925 Kharkiv
SK Poltava
Vukovar
Rio Ave
Casa Pia
Paraguay
France
Sirius
Örgryte
Brest
Juventus
Pisa
Rukh Vynnyky
LNZ Cherkasy
Dila
Virtus
Curacao
Côte d'Ivoire
Tondela
Nacional
FC Köln
Mansfield Town
Arsenal
Polissya Zhytomyr
Burnley
Manchester City
FC Union Berlin
AVS
Panama
England
Tunisia
Netherlands