Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Stand Out Games
Structural deviation compares our blended odds view (market + statistical explorer features) against market probabilities. Only games with max |Δ| of 0.5% or higher are shown.
Value pick performance (finished games)
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.1% (assigned 95.3% on the actual outcome vs market 94.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.7% on the actual outcome vs market 95.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.7% on the actual outcome vs market 95.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.7% on the actual outcome vs market 95.1%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.7% on the actual outcome vs market 95.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.8% on the actual outcome vs market 95.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.8% on the actual outcome vs market 95.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.8% on the actual outcome vs market 95.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.8% on the actual outcome vs market 95.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.8% on the actual outcome vs market 95.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.8% on the actual outcome vs market 95.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.8% on the actual outcome vs market 95.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.8% on the actual outcome vs market 95.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.8% on the actual outcome vs market 95.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 95.9% on the actual outcome vs market 95.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 0.0% (assigned 96.1% on the actual outcome vs market 95.6%).
Our content is provided for informational purposes only we do not offer betting advice and accept no responsibility for any betting decisions or losses.
Live Profit Progression
Cumulative flat-stake performance across finished value picks.
No finished value-pick data available yet.
Full History Log
| Date | Match | Selection | Odds | Outcome |
|---|
No data found
Huesca
Real Zaragoza
Young Boys
St. Gallen
Lorient
Strasbourg
Sint-Truiden
Anderlecht
Sassuolo
Como
Cádiz
Leganés
Borussia Mönchengladbach
TSG Hoffenheim
Racing Santander
Almería
Vojvodina
Ferencvárosi
Aalesund
Brann
Kayserispor
Konyaspor
Hearts
Rangers
Newcastle United
Brighton & Hove Albion
Gençlerbirliği
Kocaelispor
WSG Tirol
Ried
La Louvière
Zulte-Waregem
Portsmouth
Leicester City
FSV Mainz 05
SC Freiburg
Telstar
Heracles Almelo
Ecuador
Germany
SK Rapid
Lillestrøm
Kristiansund
Vålerenga
Sarpsborg 08
Fortuna Sittard
PEC Zwolle
Osijek
Istra 1961
Kasımpaşa
Fatih Karagümrük
Torino
Juve Stabia
Frosinone
Bari 1908
Virtus Entella
Nottingham Forest
Aston Villa
Brommapojkarna
Västerås SK
Córdoba
Sporting Gijón
Valencia
Girona
Calcio Padova
Elche
Atlético Madrid
Örgryte
Standard Liège
Antwerp
Málaga
Nacional
Alverca
Udinese
Parma
FC Andorra
Westerlo
Albacete