Market was closer to the result by 3.0% (market 23.7% on actual outcome vs our 21.9%).
Stand Out Games
Structural deviation compares our blended odds view (market + statistical explorer features) against market probabilities. Only games with max |Δ| of 0.5% or higher are shown.
Value pick performance (finished games)
Market was closer to the result by 2.3% (market 14.0% on actual outcome vs our 12.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.4% (assigned 70.5% on the actual outcome vs market 65.5%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.6% (assigned 51.7% on the actual outcome vs market 48.3%).
Market was closer to the result by 2.8% (market 28.9% on actual outcome vs our 27.0%).
Our model was closer to the result by 1.8% (assigned 60.3% on the actual outcome vs market 57.4%).
Market was closer to the result by 3.0% (market 20.3% on actual outcome vs our 18.7%).
Our model was closer to the result by 6.0% (assigned 48.1% on the actual outcome vs market 41.0%).
Market was closer to the result by 4.5% (market 27.4% on actual outcome vs our 24.1%).
Market was closer to the result by 4.7% (market 22.6% on actual outcome vs our 19.9%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.1% (assigned 73.8% on the actual outcome vs market 69.0%).
Market was closer to the result by 4.7% (market 26.8% on actual outcome vs our 23.5%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.9% (assigned 65.8% on the actual outcome vs market 60.6%).
Market was closer to the result by 5.0% (market 24.8% on actual outcome vs our 21.8%).
Our model was closer to the result by 5.9% (assigned 48.3% on the actual outcome vs market 41.2%).
Market was closer to the result by 2.6% (market 28.5% on actual outcome vs our 26.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.4% (assigned 62.3% on the actual outcome vs market 56.7%).
Market was closer to the result by 4.9% (market 26.8% on actual outcome vs our 23.5%).
Market was closer to the result by 4.9% (market 29.0% on actual outcome vs our 25.4%).
Our model was closer to the result by 1.6% (assigned 63.6% on the actual outcome vs market 60.7%).
Market was closer to the result by 2.3% (market 26.4% on actual outcome vs our 24.6%).
Our model was closer to the result by 2.4% (assigned 53.4% on the actual outcome vs market 50.2%).
Market was closer to the result by 2.7% (market 28.1% on actual outcome vs our 26.2%).
Our model was closer to the result by 3.4% (assigned 44.1% on the actual outcome vs market 40.1%).
Our content is provided for informational purposes only we do not offer betting advice and accept no responsibility for any betting decisions or losses.
Live Profit Progression
Cumulative flat-stake performance across finished value picks.
No finished value-pick data available yet.
Full History Log
| Date | Match | Selection | Odds | Outcome |
|---|
No data found