Thame vs Brislington preview

England flag 2026/2027 FA Cup, England
ASM Stadium
FA Cup
Full Time
Preliminary Round

CONTEXT

Thame hosted Brislington in a match that concluded with a 7-1 victory for the home side. The game remained level at halftime with both teams unable to break the deadlock in the opening period. Thame dominated proceedings after the interval to secure a comprehensive win. The stronger team delivered a performance that exceeded initial projections by a wide margin. No disciplinary issues arose as both sides finished with full complements. The result aligned with the pre-match assessment of team strengths. This outcome underscored Thame's superiority on the day.

TL;DR

  • Structural deviation: Thame recorded a significant deviation from expected performance levels.
  • Efficiency shift: The efficiency shift was in line with the stronger team's output.
  • xG alignment: No xG data was available to assess outcome alignment.
  • Market alignment: The final result was aligned with pre-match expectations.
  • xG expectations: No xG expectations were recorded for this fixture.
  • Event impact: The 7-1 score reflected Thame's complete second-half dominance.
  • Red card distortion: No red cards occurred and thus no distortion was present.
No standings statistics available.
No head-to-head records found.
0.5+ goals: 85%
1.5+ goals: 70%
2.5+ goals: 50%
3.5+ goals: 25%
Confidence: High (≥8 matches)

Quality vs Volume

Home: xG 1.8, Shots 12, xG/Shot 0.15
Away: xG 1.5, Shots 14, xG/Shot 0.11

Open Play vs Set Play

Open Play: 65%
Set Play: 35%

Expected Points

TeamxPts
Home1.8
Away1.2
ℹ️ Methodology: Expected Goals (xG) measures shot quality
No referee statistics available.
Thame Thame
Thame
VS
Brislington Brislington
Brislington
0
Avg Points / Game (Last 100 Matches)
3
0 i
Avg Points / Game (Last 6 Matches)
3 i
Last 6 Opponents
Thornbury Town Rank: W
0
Head to Head (Wins - Draws - Losses)
0 - 0 - 0
0

Team Power Ranking

i
What is Power Ranking?
Power score: composite of opponent-weighted form (last 6 & 20 games) and league position over last 3 seasons.
50
50
0 (Weakest) 100 (Strongest)
Metric
Thame
Brislington
Power Score
50
50
League Position
-
-
Global Rank
-
-

Form Analysis Opponent-Weighted

Line chart of recent results (points/trend). Friendlies excluded by default. Hover for opponent, result, xG/xGA and power ranking — based on last 6 matches.

vs
Thame Opponent-weighted form score
Brislington Opponent-weighted form score
Win (3 pts) Draw (1 pt) Loss (0 pts) Thame Brislington

Heatmaps Ball coordinates

Attack and defence zones from ball position data. Filters: last 6 matches (overall/home/away), time period, competition.

vs

Thame

Left / Center / Right
Opposition half density
vs season average

Brislington

Left / Center / Right
Opposition half density
vs season average
Possession Efficiency data not available for this match.

Set Pieces Efficiency Attack & Defence

Set-piece reliance and strength using expected metrics and actual outcomes for each team.

Thame ⚠ Proxy
vs
⚠ Proxy Brislington
Created Set-piece attacking threat
Thame Brislington
Set-piece xG Share Share of total expected goals generated from set pieces. Higher = more set-piece reliant in attack.
Goals per Match Average set-piece goals scored per match.
0.00 0.00
vs Expected (xG) Goals scored minus set-piece xG. Positive = overperforming; Negative = underperforming expectations.
vs
Conceded Set-piece defensive exposure
Thame Brislington
Set-piece xGA Share Share of total expected goals conceded from set pieces. Higher = more exposed to set pieces defensively.
Conceded per Match Average set-piece goals conceded per match.
0.00 0.00
vs Expected (xGA) Goals conceded minus set-piece xGA. Positive = conceding more than expected (bad); Negative = conceding less than expected (good).
vs
xG set-piece data unavailable for both teams. Values estimated using proxy metrics (shots, dangerous attacks). Confidence: Medium.
Thame
Brislington
xG Share = set-piece xG ÷ total xG
vs Expected = goals − set-piece xG

Counter / Transition Attack & Defence

What happens in the 15 seconds immediately after possession changes hands — based on Last 6 matches.

Thame
vs
Brislington
Attack After Winning Possession transition → offence
Thame Brislington
Goals per Match Average goals scored within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
Shots per Match Average shots taken within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
Dangerous Attacks Average dangerous attacks launched within 15s of winning possession per match. ↑ better
Defence After Losing Possession loss → defensive exposure
Thame Brislington
Goals Conceded Average goals conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
Shots Conceded Average shots conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
Dangerous Attacks Conceded Average dangerous attacks allowed within 15s of losing possession per match. ↓ better
Thame
Brislington
Window = 15s post-possession change
Index = 0–1 composite score
Pressure Index data not available for this match.

General Information

Date & Time
Competition
2026/2027 FA Cup, England · Preliminary Round
Stadium
ASM Stadium
Capacity
2000
Pitch Surface
Grass
Weather
☀️ 12°C, Fair

Statistics

Possession
THA
88%
BRI
13%

Top Statistics

7 Goals 1

Squad

Squad

Chris Rackley
Chris Rackley Goalkeeper
David Lynn
David Lynn Defender
Finlay Murray
Finlay Murray Defender
Tom Ashworth
Tom Ashworth Midfielder
Calvin Evans
Calvin Evans Midfielder
Greg Hackett
Greg Hackett Midfielder
Ben Sturgess
Ben Sturgess Midfielder

Squad

Tom Godsell
Tom Godsell Defender
Danny Barwood
Danny Barwood Defender
Jason Hughes
Jason Hughes Defender
Dean Gifford
Dean Gifford Defender
James Peart
James Peart Defender
Liam Peart
Liam Peart Midfielder
Josh Dryer
Josh Dryer Midfielder
Luke Meacham
Luke Meacham Midfielder
Charles Charles
Charles Charles Midfielder

CONCLUSION

Thame's commanding display after a goalless first half produced a decisive 7-1 result against Brislington. The home side converted opportunities efficiently once the second period began. Absence of red cards allowed both teams to maintain their intended structures throughout. With no xG metrics available the performance evaluation relied on the observed scoreline and possession patterns. The outcome matched the designation of Thame as the stronger side. This victory highlighted effective adjustments at the interval that shifted momentum decisively. Overall the match demonstrated clear superiority from the winners without external factors altering the flow.