Start vs Rosenborg preview
2026 Eliteserien, Norway
Sparebanken Sør Arena
Sat, 18 Jul - 2:00 PM
Round 14 ·
Regular Season
STANDINGS
Loading standings...
Sorry, standings could not be loaded right now.
| Rank | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|
| Rank | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|
| Rank | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|
Promotion
Promotion Playoffs
Relegation
Data last checked: Aug 13
CONTEXT
Match is finished. Start 0–3 Rosenborg. The result saw Rosenborg take the points. Rosenborg showed a significant deviation from the pre-match structural baseline. Possession-adjusted chance creation was in line with projected levels. The end result aligned with the pre-match projection. xG finished Start 0.9 – 1.7 Rosenborg. Possession was 45%–55%.
TL;DR
-
Structural deviation: Final score: Start 0-3 Rosenborg. Rosenborg showed a significant deviation from the pre-match structural baseline.
-
Efficiency shift: Possession-adjusted chance creation was in line with projected levels.
-
xG alignment: The final outcome was consistent with expected goal differential.
-
Market alignment: End result was aligned with the pre-match projection.
-
xG expectations: Aligned with xG expectations (Classify).
-
Event impact: No major event distortion.
-
Red card distortion: None.
No standings statistics available.
No head-to-head records found.
0.5+ goals: 85%
1.5+ goals: 70%
2.5+ goals: 50%
3.5+ goals: 25%
Confidence: High (≥8 matches)
Quality vs Volume
Home: xG 1.8, Shots 12, xG/Shot 0.15
Away: xG 1.5, Shots 14, xG/Shot 0.11
Open Play vs Set Play
Open Play: 65%
Set Play: 35%
Expected Points
| Team | xPts |
|---|---|
| Home | 1.8 |
| Away | 1.2 |
ℹ️
Methodology: Expected Goals (xG) measures shot quality
M. Aslam
Referee
•
25 matches
Fouls / Match
Referee
30.4
League Avg
0
Yellow Cards / Match
Referee
4
League Avg
0
Red Cards / Match
Referee
0.36
League Avg
0
Penalties / Match
Referee
0.36
League Avg
0
I. Jahr
1st Assistant
•
0 matches
Fouls / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
Yellow Cards / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
Red Cards / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
Penalties / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
J. Alnes Dyb
2nd Assistant
•
0 matches
Fouls / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
Yellow Cards / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
Red Cards / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
Penalties / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
J. Haga
4th Official
•
0 matches
Fouls / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
Yellow Cards / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
Red Cards / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
Penalties / Match
Referee
0
League Avg
0
A. Karadas
VS
F. Alexandersson
0.54
Avg Points / Game
(Last 100 Matches)
1
0.67 i
Last 6 Opponents
Brann
Rank: 69
L
Fredrikstad
Rank: 61
L
Vålerenga
Rank: 61
W
Bodø / Glimt
Rank: 83
L
Viking
Rank: 80
L
Tromsø
Rank: 71
D
Avg Points / Game
(Last 6 Matches)
1.17 i
Last 6 Opponents
Kristiansund
Rank: 56
W
Bodø / Glimt
Rank: 83
D
KFUM
Rank: 58
L
Aalesund
Rank: 47
L
Lillestrøm
Rank: 60
W
Viking
Rank: 80
L
0
Head to Head
(Wins - Draws - Losses)
0 - 0 - 0
0
Team Power Ranking
iWhat is Power Ranking?
Power ranking is SportMonks' model-based team strength indicator. Historical input capped to 2 seasons.
45.35
63.91
0 (Weakest)
100 (Strongest)
Metric
Start
Rosenborg
Power Score
45.35
63.91
League Position
16
10
Global Rank
805
403
Form Analysis Opponent-Weighted
Line chart of recent results (points/trend). Friendlies excluded by default. Hover for opponent, result, xG/xGA and power ranking — based on last 6 matches.
–
vs
Start
—
Opponent-weighted form score
Rosenborg
—
Opponent-weighted form score
Win (3 pts)
Draw (1 pt)
Loss (0 pts)
Start Rosenborg
Heatmaps Ball coordinates
Attack and defence zones from ball position data. Filters: last 6 matches (overall/home/away), time period, competition.
–
vs
Loading…
Start
Left / Center / Right —
Opposition half density —
vs season average —
Own half density —
vs season average —
Rosenborg
Left / Center / Right —
Opposition half density —
vs season average —
Own half density —
vs season average —
Possession Efficiency Possession-Adjusted
How effectively each team uses and defends their share of possession. Efficiency adjusted based on team possession percentage
Start
⚠ Proxy
vs
⚠ Proxy
Rosenborg
Attacking Efficiency
Higher is better
Attacking Efficiency
36.89
Defensive Efficiency
Lower is better
Defensive Efficiency
20.73
Combined Efficiency Index
Z-score combining attacking and defensive possession-adjusted efficiency.
Positive = above league average.
Negative = below league average.
Formula: EfficiencyIndex = z(AttackEff) − z(DefenceEff)
Positive = above league average.
Negative = below league average.
Formula: EfficiencyIndex = z(AttackEff) − z(DefenceEff)
-3
0
3
Start
+1.57
Efficiency Index
vs
Rosenborg
-1.57
Efficiency Index
xG data unavailable for both teams. Values estimated using shots and dangerous attacks (proxy). Confidence: Medium.
Start
Rosenborg
AttackEff = xG ÷ pos
DefenceEff = xGA ÷ (1−pos)
Set Pieces Efficiency Attack & Defence
Set-piece reliance and strength using expected metrics and actual outcomes for each team.
Start
vs
Rosenborg
Created
Set-piece attacking threat
Start
Rosenborg
Set-piece xG Share
Share of total expected goals generated from set pieces. Higher = more set-piece reliant in attack.
20%
Goals per Match
Average set-piece goals scored per match.
0.00
1.00
vs Expected (xG)
Goals scored minus set-piece xG. Positive = overperforming; Negative = underperforming expectations.
-0.19
vs
+0.11
Conceded
Set-piece defensive exposure
Start
Rosenborg
Set-piece xGA Share
Share of total expected goals conceded from set pieces. Higher = more exposed to set pieces defensively.
52%
Conceded per Match
Average set-piece goals conceded per match.
1.00
0.00
vs Expected (xGA)
Goals conceded minus set-piece xGA. Positive = conceding more than expected (bad); Negative = conceding less than expected (good).
+0.11
vs
-0.19
Start
Rosenborg
xG Share = set-piece xG ÷ total xG
vs Expected = goals − set-piece xG
Counter / Transition Attack & Defence
What happens in the 15 seconds immediately after possession changes hands — based on Last 6 matches.
–
Start
vs
Rosenborg
Attack After Winning
Possession transition → offence
Start
Rosenborg
Goals per Match
Average goals scored within 15s of winning the ball per match.
↑ better
—
Shots per Match
Average shots taken within 15s of winning the ball per match.
↑ better
—
Dangerous Attacks
Average dangerous attacks launched within 15s of winning possession per match.
↑ better
—
Transition Efficiency Index
Composite score (0–1) of how efficiently this team attacks within 15s of winning the ball. Higher = more dangerous on transition.
Higher = stronger on the counter
Start
0.27
Rosenborg
0.19
Defence After Losing
Possession loss → defensive exposure
Start
Rosenborg
Goals Conceded
Average goals conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match.
↓ better
—
Shots Conceded
Average shots conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match.
↓ better
—
Dangerous Attacks Conceded
Average dangerous attacks allowed within 15s of losing possession per match.
↓ better
—
Vulnerability Index
Composite score (0–1) of how exposed this team is within 15s of losing the ball. Lower = better at preventing transition attacks.
Lower = better transition defence
Start
0.06
Rosenborg
0.00
Start
Rosenborg
Window = 15s post-possession change
Index = 0–1 composite score
PRESSURE INDEX
Momentum phases from smoothed minute-by-minute pressure.
- IKS had peak pressure around 61'.
- RBK started the game with stronger pressure.
IKS Pressure
RBK Pressure
⚡
Pressure Index:
IKS reached the top pressure at 61' (92.65).
STARTING XI
Match Formation
5-3-2
Match Formation
4-1-4-1
27 O. Toure
29 E. Reitan
6 (C) J. Norheim
10 S. Mvoue
23 E. Segberg
18 M. Ugland
17 J. Cornelius
20 H. Lorentzen
19 A. Pereira
21 T. Nemčík
4 M. Ceide
22 (C) J. Svensson
10 O. Selnæs
35 E. Ceide
17 M. Bomholt
29 D. Duris
2
18 A. Chiakha
General Information
Date & Time
Jul 18, 2026, 02:00 PM
Competition
2026 Eliteserien, Norway · Round 14 · Regular Season
Stadium
Sparebanken Sør Arena
Capacity
14563
Pitch Surface
Artificial turf
Weather
☀️ 12°C, Fair
Referees
Mohammad Usman Aslam
Ivar Michael Jahr
Jim André Alnes Dyb
Jørgen Haga
Next Match
Start
vs
Kristiansund
League: Eliteserien
Kickoff: Sat, 25 Jul - 2:00 PM
Venue: Kristiansund Stadion
Rosenborg
vs
Manchester United
League: Club Friendlies 1
Kickoff: Fri, 24 Jul - 4:00 PM
Venue: Lerkendal Stadion
Statistics
Possession
IKS
48%
RBK
52%
Top Statistics
0
Goals
3
0
Big Chances Created
2
10
Shots
3
52
Dangerous attacks
48
45
Possession
55
5
Corners
3
15
Free kicks
14
1
Yellow Cards
2
Match Overview
58
Ball Safe
76
0
Penalties
1
4
Goal Kicks
18
14
Goal Attempts
8
3
Substitutions
5
25
Throwins
28
16
Dribble Attempts
22
9
Successful Dribbles
8
56
Successful Dribbles Percentage
36
Attacking
92
Attacks
101
1
Counter Attacks
0
Possession
76
Long Passes
52
309
Passes
398
220
Successful Passes
313
71
Successful Passes Percentage
79
9
Key Passes
7
34
Successful Long Passes
12
45
Successful Long Passes Percentage
23
Defensive
3
Saves
3
19
Tackles
16
7
Interceptions
7
66
Duels Won
49
Build-up
23
Total Crosses
6
8
Accurate Crosses
4
Discipline
1
Offsides
2
15
Fouls
15
Lineup
Referee :
Mohammad Usman Aslam
Manager ▼
A. Karadas
Coach
Starting XI ▼
Substitutes ▼
39
Dennis Cornelius Birkenes
Goalkeeper
2
F. Pålerud
Defender
3
A. Ujkani
Defender
5
O. Jebali
Defender
14
Markus Soomets
Midfielder
30
L. Gausdal
Midfielder
Referee :
Mohammad Usman Aslam
Manager ▼
F. Alexandersson
Coach
Starting XI ▼
Substitutes ▼
12
Rasmus Sandberg
Goalkeeper
5
Håkon Volden
Defender
16
Aslak Witry
Defender
11
Noah Sahsah
Attacker
Events
2ND-HALF
90+5'
Left foot shot / 2nd Goal
90+3'
Right foot shot / 1st Goal
4th Yellowcard
90+1'
8th Substitution
78'
77'
Foul / 3rd Yellowcard
75'
6th Substitution
75'
7th Substitution
74'
Foul / 2nd Yellowcard
Foul / 1st Yellowcard
73'
65'
4th Substitution
65'
5th Substitution
1st Substitution
46'
3rd Substitution
46'
46'
2nd Substitution
1ST-HALF
Azar Karadas
Argument / 5th Yellowcard
36'
35'
Right foot shot / 1st Penalty
CONCLUSION
Final score detail: Start 0-3 Rosenborg. Structural assessment: Rosenborg exhibited a significant deviation from the pre-match structural baseline. Efficiency outcome: Possession-adjusted chance creation finished in line with projected levels. Result alignment: The final score was consistent with the pre-match probability model. Market alignment: The match result was within the projected probability range.
