Spartak Trnava vs Beşiktaş preview

2026 Club Friendlies 1, World
Štadión Antona Malatinského Tue, 14 Jul - 3:30 PM
Club Friendlies 1
Full Time Tue, 14 Jul 3:30 PM
Regular Season

CONTEXT

Spartak Trnava defeated Beşiktaş 3-2 with a halftime score of 3-1. The home side held 41 percent possession while the visitors managed 59 percent. Beşiktaş entered as the stronger team yet Spartak Trnava claimed the result through an early three-goal advantage. No red cards were shown to either side. The significant deviation was recorded for Spartak Trnava. Efficiency remained in line with the outcome and the result aligned with market expectations. Missing xG values prevented direct assessment of expected goals against the actual scoreline. The second half produced no further adjustments that altered the established pattern.

TL;DR

  • Structural deviation: Spartak Trnava recorded a significant deviation as the match winner.
  • Efficiency shift: The efficiency shift remained in line with the 3-2 result.
  • xG alignment: No xG data was recorded to evaluate alignment with the score.
  • Market alignment: The outcome proved aligned with market expectations.
  • xG expectations: xG expectations could not be formed due to absent metrics.
  • Event impact: The 3-1 halftime lead shaped the final 3-2 scoreline.
  • Red card distortion: Zero red cards produced no distortion in team balance.
No standings statistics available.
No head-to-head records found.
0.5+ goals: 85%
1.5+ goals: 70%
2.5+ goals: 50%
3.5+ goals: 25%
Confidence: High (≥8 matches)

Quality vs Volume

Home: xG 1.8, Shots 12, xG/Shot 0.15
Away: xG 1.5, Shots 14, xG/Shot 0.11

Open Play vs Set Play

Open Play: 65%
Set Play: 35%

Expected Points

TeamxPts
Home1.8
Away1.2
ℹ️ Methodology: Expected Goals (xG) measures shot quality
P. Kralovic
P. Kralovic
Referee 25 matches
Fouls / Match
Referee 30.4
League Avg 0
Yellow Cards / Match
Referee 4
League Avg 0
Red Cards / Match
Referee 0.36
League Avg 0
Penalties / Match
Referee 0.36
League Avg 0
Spartak Trnava Spartak Trnava
Spartak Trnava
VS
Beşiktaş Beşiktaş
Beşiktaş
0
Avg Points / Game (Last 100 Matches)
2
0 i
Avg Points / Game (Last 6 Matches)
2 i
Last 6 Opponents
MTE 1904 Rank: D
Gyirmót Rank: 39 W
0
Head to Head (Wins - Draws - Losses)
0 - 0 - 0
0

Team Power Ranking

i
What is Power Ranking?
Power ranking is SportMonks' model-based team strength indicator. Historical input capped to 2 seasons.
75.47
77.23
0 (Weakest) 100 (Strongest)
Metric
Spartak Trnava
Beşiktaş
Power Score
75.47
77.23
League Position
-
-
Global Rank
133
98

Form Analysis Opponent-Weighted

Line chart of recent results (points/trend). Friendlies excluded by default. Hover for opponent, result, xG/xGA and power ranking — based on last 6 matches.

vs
Spartak Trnava Opponent-weighted form score
Beşiktaş Opponent-weighted form score
Win (3 pts) Draw (1 pt) Loss (0 pts) Spartak Trnava Beşiktaş

Heatmaps Ball coordinates

Attack and defence zones from ball position data. Filters: last 6 matches (overall/home/away), time period, competition.

vs

Spartak Trnava

Left / Center / Right
Opposition half density
vs season average

Beşiktaş

Left / Center / Right
Opposition half density
vs season average

Possession Efficiency Possession-Adjusted

How effectively each team uses and defends their share of possession. Efficiency adjusted based on team possession percentage

Spartak Trnava ⚠ Proxy
vs
⚠ Proxy Beşiktaş
Attacking Efficiency
Higher is better
Attacking Efficiency
21.46
30.85
Defensive Efficiency
Lower is better
Defensive Efficiency
30.85
21.46
Combined Efficiency Index Z-score combining attacking and defensive possession-adjusted efficiency.
Positive = above league average.
Negative = below league average.
Formula: EfficiencyIndex = z(AttackEff) − z(DefenceEff)
-3 0 3
Spartak Trnava -0.10 Efficiency Index
vs
Beşiktaş +0.10 Efficiency Index
xG data unavailable for both teams. Values estimated using shots and dangerous attacks (proxy). Confidence: Medium.
Spartak Trnava
Beşiktaş
AttackEff = xG ÷ pos
DefenceEff = xGA ÷ (1−pos)

Set Pieces Efficiency Attack & Defence

Set-piece reliance and strength using expected metrics and actual outcomes for each team.

Spartak Trnava ⚠ Proxy
vs
⚠ Proxy Beşiktaş
Created Set-piece attacking threat
Spartak Trnava Beşiktaş
Set-piece xG Share Share of total expected goals generated from set pieces. Higher = more set-piece reliant in attack.
Goals per Match Average set-piece goals scored per match.
0.00 0.00
vs Expected (xG) Goals scored minus set-piece xG. Positive = overperforming; Negative = underperforming expectations.
vs
Conceded Set-piece defensive exposure
Spartak Trnava Beşiktaş
Set-piece xGA Share Share of total expected goals conceded from set pieces. Higher = more exposed to set pieces defensively.
Conceded per Match Average set-piece goals conceded per match.
0.00 0.00
vs Expected (xGA) Goals conceded minus set-piece xGA. Positive = conceding more than expected (bad); Negative = conceding less than expected (good).
vs
xG set-piece data unavailable for both teams. Values estimated using proxy metrics (shots, dangerous attacks). Confidence: Medium.
Spartak Trnava
Beşiktaş
xG Share = set-piece xG ÷ total xG
vs Expected = goals − set-piece xG

Counter / Transition Attack & Defence

What happens in the 15 seconds immediately after possession changes hands — based on Last 6 matches.

Spartak Trnava
vs
Beşiktaş
Attack After Winning Possession transition → offence
Spartak Trnava Beşiktaş
Goals per Match Average goals scored within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
Shots per Match Average shots taken within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
Dangerous Attacks Average dangerous attacks launched within 15s of winning possession per match. ↑ better
Defence After Losing Possession loss → defensive exposure
Spartak Trnava Beşiktaş
Goals Conceded Average goals conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
Shots Conceded Average shots conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
Dangerous Attacks Conceded Average dangerous attacks allowed within 15s of losing possession per match. ↓ better
Spartak Trnava
Beşiktaş
Window = 15s post-possession change
Index = 0–1 composite score

PRESSURE INDEX

Momentum phases from smoothed minute-by-minute pressure.

  • BES had peak pressure around 77'.
  • BES started the game with stronger pressure.
STR Pressure BES Pressure
Pressure Index: BES reached the top pressure at 77' (58.45).

General Information

Date & Time
Jul 14, 2026, 03:30 PM
Competition
2026 Club Friendlies 1, World · Regular Season
Stadium
Štadión Antona Malatinského
Capacity
19200
Pitch Surface
Grass
Weather
☀️ 12°C, Fair
Referees
Peter Kralovic

Statistics

Possession
STR
44%
BES
56%

Top Statistics

3 Goals 2
3 Shots 13
36 Dangerous attacks 64
41 Possession 59
2 Corners 8
17 Free kicks 13

Match Overview

81 Ball Safe 64
6 Goal Attempts 14
2 Substitutions 4
16 Throwins 15
2 Injuries 1
6 Dribble Attempts 4

Attacking

78 Attacks 88

Possession

32 Long Passes 28
329 Passes 469
76 Successful Passes Percentage 84
4 Key Passes 14

Defensive

2 Saves 1
8 Tackles 13
5 Interceptions 7

Build-up

6 Total Crosses 10

Discipline

2 Offsides 0
13 Fouls 17

Squad

Referee : Peter Kralovic

Squad

72
Martin Vantruba
Martin Vantruba Goalkeeper
31
Martin Janáček
Martin Janáček Goalkeeper
24
Kristián Koštrna
4
Libor Holík
Libor Holík Defender
27
Michal Tomič
Michal Tomič Defender
29
Martin Mikovič
Martin Mikovič Defender
2
Patrick Nwadike
Patrick Nwadike Defender
16
Melos Bajrami
Melos Bajrami Defender
Ivan Anokye Mensah
Marek Ujlaky
Marek Ujlaky Defender
6
Roman Procházka
Roman Procházka Midfielder
52
Erik Sabo
Erik Sabo Midfielder
5
Roman Begala
Roman Begala Midfielder
91
Marin Laušić
Marin Laušić Midfielder
8
Giorgi Moistsrapishvili
Giorgi Moistsrapishvili Midfielder
19
Timotej Kudlička
Timotej Kudlička Midfielder
30
Luka Khorkheli
Luka Khorkheli Midfielder
Kristián Pavol Stručka
20
Filip Trello
Filip Trello Midfielder
18
Hillary Gong Chukwah
11
Philip Azango Elayo
Tijmen Wildeboer
Tijmen Wildeboer Attacker
7
Stefan Skrbo
Stefan Skrbo Attacker
Lorent Mehmeti
Lorent Mehmeti Attacker
22
Dávid Bukovský
Dávid Bukovský Attacker
Referee : Peter Kralovic

Squad

1
Alexander Nübel
Alexander Nübel Goalkeeper
80
Doğan Alemdar
Doğan Alemdar Goalkeeper
99
Emre Bilgin
Emre Bilgin Goalkeeper
96
Emir Yaşar
Emir Yaşar Goalkeeper
14
Felix Uduokhai
Felix Uduokhai Defender
Tayyib Talha Sanuç
Tayyib Talha Sanuç Defender
53
Emir Han Topçu
Emir Han Topçu Defender
33
Rıdvan Yılmaz
Rıdvan Yılmaz Defender
Emrecan Uzunhan
Emrecan Uzunhan Defender
12
Emmanuel Agbadou
Emmanuel Agbadou Defender
11
Kassoum Ouattara
Kassoum Ouattara Defender
58
Yasin Özcan
Yasin Özcan Defender
22
Taylan Bulut
Taylan Bulut Defender
4
Onyinye Wilfred Ndidi
6
Salih Özcan
Salih Özcan Midfielder
Amir Hadžiahmetović
João Mário Naval da Costa Eduardo
João Mário Naval da Costa Eduardo Midfielder
Almoatasembellah Ali Mohamed Elmusrati
Almoatasembellah Ali Mohamed Elmusrati Midfielder
10
Orkun Kökçü
Orkun Kökçü Midfielder
8
Kartal Kayra Yılmaz
Jean Emile Junior Onana Onana
Jean Emile Junior Onana Onana Midfielder
15
Junior Olaitan
Junior Olaitan Midfielder
68
Fahri Kerem Ay
Fahri Kerem Ay Midfielder
Élan Joshep Ricardo Ochoa
Élan Joshep Ricardo Ochoa Midfielder
7
Milot Rashica
Milot Rashica Attacker
18
Václav Černý
Václav Černý Attacker
Leandro Trossard
Leandro Trossard Attacker
Can Keles
Can Keles Attacker
9
Hyun-Gyu Oh
Hyun-Gyu Oh Attacker
90
Semih Kılıçsoy
Yakup Arda Kılıç
Yakup Arda Kılıç Attacker
23
Mustafa Hekimoglu
29
Ilhan Fakili
Ilhan Fakili Attacker
52
Devrim Şahin
Devrim Şahin Attacker

Events

2ND-HALF
78'
Event
5th Goal
1ST-HALF
Event
4th Goal
45+2'
45'
37'
13'
Event
1st Goal

CONCLUSION

The 3-2 result reflected Spartak Trnava capitalizing on an early lead despite lower possession. Beşiktaş retained territorial control in the second half but could not close the gap created before the interval. Absence of xG figures leaves efficiency comparisons reliant on the raw score and possession split alone. Market alignment held while the significant deviation attached to the home winner. No dismissals occurred so the contest maintained eleven players per side throughout. The pattern shows how an established halftime margin limited later adjustments by the visitors. Further matches would benefit from xG availability to refine post-match evaluation of chance quality versus conversion.