Sandefjord vs KFUM preview

Norway flag 2026 Eliteserien, Norway
Komplett Arena Fri, 7 Aug - 5:00 PM
Eliteserien
SandefjordSandefjord
0 1
KFUMKFUM
Full Time Fri, 7 Aug 5:00 PM
Round 17 Regular Season
|
Goal
Jakob Vester 30' Red Card
|

CONTEXT

Match is finished. Sandefjord 0–1 KFUM. The result saw KFUM take the points. KFUM showed a significant deviation from the pre-match structural baseline. Possession-adjusted chance creation was in line with projected levels. The end result aligned with the pre-match projection. xG finished Sandefjord 1.8 – 1.9 KFUM. Possession was 50%–50%. The match featured at least one red card, which may have affected the flow of the game.

TL;DR

  • Structural deviation: Final score: Sandefjord 0-1 KFUM. KFUM showed a significant deviation from the pre-match structural baseline.
  • Efficiency shift: Possession-adjusted chance creation was in line with projected levels.
  • xG alignment: The final outcome was consistent with expected goal differential.
  • Market alignment: End result was aligned with the pre-match projection.
  • xG expectations: Aligned with xG expectations (Classify).
  • Event impact: Red card(s) affected the match (Classify).
  • Red card distortion: Classify as red card distortion.
No standings statistics available.
No head-to-head records found.
0.5+ goals: 85%
1.5+ goals: 70%
2.5+ goals: 50%
3.5+ goals: 25%
Confidence: High (≥8 matches)

Quality vs Volume

Home: xG 1.8, Shots 12, xG/Shot 0.15
Away: xG 1.5, Shots 14, xG/Shot 0.11

Open Play vs Set Play

Open Play: 65%
Set Play: 35%

Expected Points

TeamxPts
Home1.8
Away1.2
ℹ️ Methodology: Expected Goals (xG) measures shot quality
J. Haugen
J. Haugen
Referee • 25 matches
Fouls / Match
Referee 30.4
League Avg 0
Yellow Cards / Match
Referee 4
League Avg 0
Red Cards / Match
Referee 0.36
League Avg 0
Penalties / Match
Referee 0.36
League Avg 0
J. Knutsen
J. Knutsen
1st Assistant • 0 matches
Fouls / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
Yellow Cards / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
Red Cards / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
Penalties / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
E. Helgerud
E. Helgerud
2nd Assistant • 0 matches
Fouls / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
Yellow Cards / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
Red Cards / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
Penalties / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
S. Sritharan
S. Sritharan
4th Official • 0 matches
Fouls / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
Yellow Cards / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
Red Cards / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
Penalties / Match
Referee 0
League Avg 0
Sandefjord A. Tegström
A. Tegström
VS
KFUM J. Isnes
J. Isnes
1
Avg Points / Game (Last 100 Matches)
1
0.33 i
Last 6 Opponents
Fredrikstad Rank: 64 L
Bodø / Glimt Rank: 85 L
Viking Rank: 79 L
HamKam Rank: 63 D
Molde Rank: 68 L
Fredrikstad Rank: 62 D
Avg Points / Game (Last 6 Matches)
1.17 i
Last 6 Opponents
Kristiansund Rank: 58 W
Molde Rank: 67 L
Lillestrøm Rank: 59 L
Bodø / Glimt Rank: 85 L
Tromsø Rank: 72 D
Rosenborg Rank: 66 W
3
Head to Head (Wins - Draws - Losses)
3 - 1 - 1
1

Team Power Ranking

i
What is Power Ranking?
Power ranking is SportMonks' model-based team strength indicator. Historical input capped to 2 seasons.
61.56
60.28
0 (Weakest) 100 (Strongest)
Metric
Sandefjord
KFUM
Power Score
61.56
60.28
League Position
13
11
Global Rank
532
565

Form Analysis Opponent-Weighted

Line chart of recent results (points/trend). Friendlies excluded by default. Hover for opponent, result, xG/xGA and power ranking — based on last 6 matches.

–
vs
Sandefjord — Opponent-weighted form score
KFUM — Opponent-weighted form score
Win (3 pts) Draw (1 pt) Loss (0 pts) Sandefjord KFUM

Heatmaps Ball coordinates

Attack and defence zones from ball position data. Filters: last 6 matches (overall/home/away), time period, competition.

–
vs

Sandefjord

Left / Center / Right —
Opposition half density —
vs season average —

KFUM

Left / Center / Right —
Opposition half density —
vs season average —

Possession Efficiency Possession-Adjusted

How effectively each team uses and defends their share of possession. Efficiency adjusted based on team possession percentage

Sandefjord ⚠ Proxy
vs
⚠ Proxy KFUM
Attacking Efficiency
Higher is better
Attacking Efficiency
41.30
35.90
Defensive Efficiency
Lower is better
Defensive Efficiency
35.90
41.30
Combined Efficiency Index Z-score combining attacking and defensive possession-adjusted efficiency.
Positive = above league average.
Negative = below league average.
Formula: EfficiencyIndex = z(AttackEff) − z(DefenceEff)
-3 0 3
Sandefjord +0.52 Efficiency Index
vs
KFUM -0.52 Efficiency Index
xG data unavailable for both teams. Values estimated using shots and dangerous attacks (proxy). Confidence: Medium.
Sandefjord
KFUM
AttackEff = xG ÷ pos
DefenceEff = xGA ÷ (1−pos)

Set Pieces Efficiency Attack & Defence

Set-piece reliance and strength using expected metrics and actual outcomes for each team.

Sandefjord
vs
KFUM
Created Set-piece attacking threat
Sandefjord KFUM
Set-piece xG Share Share of total expected goals generated from set pieces. Higher = more set-piece reliant in attack.
31%
2%
Goals per Match Average set-piece goals scored per match.
0.00 0.00
vs Expected (xG) Goals scored minus set-piece xG. Positive = overperforming; Negative = underperforming expectations.
-0.54 vs -0.04
Conceded Set-piece defensive exposure
Sandefjord KFUM
Set-piece xGA Share Share of total expected goals conceded from set pieces. Higher = more exposed to set pieces defensively.
2%
31%
Conceded per Match Average set-piece goals conceded per match.
0.00 0.00
vs Expected (xGA) Goals conceded minus set-piece xGA. Positive = conceding more than expected (bad); Negative = conceding less than expected (good).
-0.04 vs -0.54
Sandefjord
KFUM
xG Share = set-piece xG ÷ total xG
vs Expected = goals − set-piece xG

Counter / Transition Attack & Defence

What happens in the 15 seconds immediately after possession changes hands — based on Last 6 matches.

–
Sandefjord
vs
KFUM
Attack After Winning Possession transition → offence
Sandefjord KFUM
Goals per Match Average goals scored within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
—
—
Shots per Match Average shots taken within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
—
—
Dangerous Attacks Average dangerous attacks launched within 15s of winning possession per match. ↑ better
—
—
Transition Efficiency Index Composite score (0–1) of how efficiently this team attacks within 15s of winning the ball. Higher = more dangerous on transition. Higher = stronger on the counter
Sandefjord 1.54
KFUM 0.89
Defence After Losing Possession loss → defensive exposure
Sandefjord KFUM
Goals Conceded Average goals conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
—
—
Shots Conceded Average shots conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
—
—
Dangerous Attacks Conceded Average dangerous attacks allowed within 15s of losing possession per match. ↓ better
—
—
Vulnerability Index Composite score (0–1) of how exposed this team is within 15s of losing the ball. Lower = better at preventing transition attacks. Lower = better transition defence
Sandefjord 0.05
KFUM 0.00
Sandefjord
KFUM
Window = 15s post-possession change
Index = 0–1 composite score

PRESSURE INDEX

Momentum phases from smoothed minute-by-minute pressure.

  • Sandefjord had peak pressure around 15'.
  • Sandefjord started the game with stronger pressure.
Sandefjord Pressure KFUM Pressure
⚡
Pressure Index: Sandefjord reached the top pressure at 15' (70.01).

Team Head to Head Last 6 Seasons

Summary of 5 matches between these sides — filtered by competition and venue context.

Sandefjord Sandefjord Home
5 matches
KFUM KFUM Away
Match Record
3
Wins
1
1
Draws
1
1
Losses
3
Goals
10
Goals Scored
8
8
Goals Conceded
10
+2
Goal Difference
-2
Expected Goals
0
xG
0
0
xGA
0

Data last updated: 2026-08-08T00:00:35+00:00

STARTING XI

Match Formation 4-1-4-1
Match Formation 3-4-3
Pitch

General Information

Date & Time
Aug 07, 2026, 05:00 PM
Competition
2026 Eliteserien, Norway · Round 17 · Regular Season
Stadium
Komplett Arena
Capacity
6582
Pitch Surface
Grass
Weather
☀️ 12°C, Fair
Referees
Jørgen Haugen
Jon-Michael Knutsen
Edvard Helgerud
Satha Sejoohn Sritharan

Statistics

Possession
Sandefjord
51%
KFUM
49%

Top Statistics

0 Goals 1
1 Big Chances Created 2
8 Shots 4
13 Dangerous attacks 19
50 Possession 50
5 Corners 6
19 Free kicks 11
2 Yellow Cards 3
1 Red Cards 0

Match Overview

69 Ball Safe 56
5 Goal Kicks 7
4 Goal Attempts 6
5 Substitutions 5
21 Throwins 14
1 Hit Woodwork 0
1 Injuries 0
14 Dribble Attempts 12
7 Successful Dribbles 3
50 Successful Dribbles Percentage 25

Attacking

28 Attacks 34
1 Big Chances Missed 2
1 Counter Attacks 6

Possession

64 Long Passes 60
456 Passes 453
367 Successful Passes 378
80 Successful Passes Percentage 83
12 Key Passes 12
29 Successful Long Passes 19
45 Successful Long Passes Percentage 32

Defensive

6 Saves 4
16 Tackles 14
6 Interceptions 14
56 Duels Won 40

Build-up

16 Total Crosses 14
9 Accurate Crosses 1

Discipline

1 Offsides 2
11 Fouls 19

Lineup

Referee : Jørgen Haugen

Starting XI ▼

30
Elias Hadaya
Elias Hadaya Goalkeeper
7.74
3
Vetle Walle Egeli
Vetle Walle Egeli Defender
7.23
2
Martin Hellan
Martin Hellan
Defender89'
6.76
4
Fredrik Carson Pedersen
Fredrik Carson Pedersen Defender
6.72
16
Håkon Krogelien
Håkon Krogelien
Defender89'
13
Rasmus Holten
Rasmus Holten Defender
6.9
44
Xander Lambrix
Xander Lambrix Defender
7.79
6
Sander Risan Mørk
Sander Risan Mørk (C) Midfielder
7.3
7
Evangelos Patoulidis
Evangelos Patoulidis Midfielder
7.37
18
Mathias Sauer
Mathias Sauer
Midfielder81'
6.73
14
Edvard Sundbø Pettersen
Edvard Sundbø Pettersen Midfielder
6.27
19
Bendik Berntsen
Bendik Berntsen Midfielder
6.45
17
Foster Apetorgbor
Foster Apetorgbor
Attacker69'
6.65
37
Jakob Vester
Jakob Vester Midfielder
5.19
24
Sebastian Holm Mathisen
Sebastian Holm Mathisen Attacker
6.93
27
Jakob Dunsby
Jakob Dunsby
Attacker69'
7.11
Referee : Jørgen Haugen

Starting XI ▼

25
Havar Jensen
Havar Jensen Goalkeeper
7.25
2
Daniel Schneider
Daniel Schneider Defender
7.14
5
Fredrik Berglie
Fredrik Berglie Defender
7.13
4
Momodou Lion Njie
Momodou Lion Njie
Defender34'
6.98
13
Brage Skaret
Brage Skaret Defender
6.58
7
Robin Rasch
Robin Rasch (C) Midfielder
6.81
9
Martin Tangen Vinjor
Martin Tangen Vinjor
Midfielder34'
6.79
14
Håkon Helland Hoseth
Håkon Helland Hoseth Midfielder
7.46
21
S. Sjøkvist
S. Sjøkvist
Defender89'
16
Jonas Lange Hjorth
Jonas Lange Hjorth Midfielder
6.83
27
T. Sørås
T. Sørås Midfielder
7.02
19
Eirik Saunes
Eirik Saunes
Defender62'
6.84
10
Bilal Njie
Bilal Njie Attacker
7.21
18
Rasmus Eggen Vinge
Rasmus Eggen Vinge Attacker
7.1
23
Magnus Wolff Eikrem
Magnus Wolff Eikrem Attacker
7.06
22
Bjørn Martin Kristensen
Bjørn Martin Kristensen
Attacker62'
6.18

Events

2ND-HALF
Event
Martin Hellan → Vetle Walle Egeli
8th Substitution
89'
Event
Håkon Krogelien → Fredrik Carson Pedersen
9th Substitution
89'
89'
Event
S. Sjøkvist → Håkon Helland Hoseth
10th Substitution
Event
Mathias Sauer → Evangelos Patoulidis
7th Substitution
81'
Event
Evangelos Patoulidis
Foul / 5th Yellowcard
80'
75'
Event
Momodou Lion Njie
Foul / 4th Yellowcard
Event
Vetle Walle Egeli
Foul / 3rd Yellowcard
74'
Event
Andreas Tegstrom
Argument / 6th Yellowcard
71'
Event
Foster Apetorgbor → Bendik Berntsen
5th Substitution
69'
Event
Jakob Dunsby → Sebastian Holm Mathisen
6th Substitution
69'
62'
Event
Bjørn Martin Kristensen → Magnus Wolff Eikrem
3rd Substitution
62'
Event
Eirik Saunes → T. Sørås
4th Substitution
59'
Event
Daniel Schneider
Foul / 2nd Yellowcard
1ST-HALF
45+3'
Event
Håkon Helland Hoseth
Left foot shot / 1st Goal
34'
Event
Momodou Lion Njie → Fredrik Berglie
1st Substitution
34'
Event
Martin Tangen Vinjor → Robin Rasch
2nd Substitution
Event
Jakob Vester
Foul / 1st Redcard
30'
24'
Event
Brage Skaret
Foul / 1st Yellowcard

CONCLUSION

Final score detail: Sandefjord 0-1 KFUM. Structural assessment: KFUM exhibited a significant deviation from the pre-match structural baseline. Efficiency outcome: Possession-adjusted chance creation finished in line with projected levels. Result alignment: The final score was consistent with the pre-match probability model. Structural distortion: The match was materially influenced by red card(s), altering baseline dynamics. Market alignment: The match result was within the projected probability range.