Kidlington vs Larkhall Athletic preview

England flag 2026/2027 FA Cup, England
Yarnton Road
FA Cup
Full Time
Extra Preliminary Round

CONTEXT

Match is finished. Kidlington 1–3 Larkhall Athletic. The result saw Larkhall Athletic take the points. Larkhall Athletic showed a significant deviation from the pre-match structural baseline. Possession-adjusted chance creation was in line with projected levels. The end result aligned with the pre-match projection.

TL;DR

  • Structural deviation: Final score: Kidlington 1-3 Larkhall Athletic. Larkhall Athletic showed a significant deviation from the pre-match structural baseline.
  • Efficiency shift: Possession-adjusted chance creation was in line with projected levels.
  • xG alignment: The final outcome was insufficient data for expected goal differential.
  • Market alignment: End result was aligned with the pre-match projection.
  • xG expectations: Inconclusive for xG expectations (Classify).
  • Event impact: No major event distortion.
  • Red card distortion: None.
No standings statistics available.
No head-to-head records found.
0.5+ goals: 85%
1.5+ goals: 70%
2.5+ goals: 50%
3.5+ goals: 25%
Confidence: High (≥8 matches)

Quality vs Volume

Home: xG 1.8, Shots 12, xG/Shot 0.15
Away: xG 1.5, Shots 14, xG/Shot 0.11

Open Play vs Set Play

Open Play: 65%
Set Play: 35%

Expected Points

TeamxPts
Home1.8
Away1.2
ℹ️ Methodology: Expected Goals (xG) measures shot quality
No referee statistics available.
Kidlington Kidlington
Kidlington
VS
Larkhall Athletic Larkhall Athletic
Larkhall Athletic
0
Avg Points / Game (Last 100 Matches)
0
0 i
Avg Points / Game (Last 6 Matches)
0 i
0
Head to Head (Wins - Draws - Losses)
0 - 0 - 0
0

Team Power Ranking

i
What is Power Ranking?
Power score: composite of opponent-weighted form (last 6 & 20 games) and league position over last 3 seasons.
50
50
0 (Weakest) 100 (Strongest)
Metric
Kidlington
Larkhall Athletic
Power Score
50
50
League Position
-
-
Global Rank
-
-

Form Analysis Opponent-Weighted

Line chart of recent results (points/trend). Friendlies excluded by default. Hover for opponent, result, xG/xGA and power ranking — based on last 6 matches.

vs
Kidlington Opponent-weighted form score
Larkhall Athletic Opponent-weighted form score
Win (3 pts) Draw (1 pt) Loss (0 pts) Kidlington Larkhall Athletic

Heatmaps Ball coordinates

Attack and defence zones from ball position data. Filters: last 6 matches (overall/home/away), time period, competition.

vs

Kidlington

Left / Center / Right
Opposition half density
vs season average

Larkhall Athletic

Left / Center / Right
Opposition half density
vs season average
Possession Efficiency data not available for this match.

Set Pieces Efficiency Attack & Defence

Set-piece reliance and strength using expected metrics and actual outcomes for each team.

Kidlington ⚠ Proxy
vs
⚠ Proxy Larkhall Athletic
Created Set-piece attacking threat
Kidlington Larkhall Athletic
Set-piece xG Share Share of total expected goals generated from set pieces. Higher = more set-piece reliant in attack.
Goals per Match Average set-piece goals scored per match.
vs Expected (xG) Goals scored minus set-piece xG. Positive = overperforming; Negative = underperforming expectations.
vs
Conceded Set-piece defensive exposure
Kidlington Larkhall Athletic
Set-piece xGA Share Share of total expected goals conceded from set pieces. Higher = more exposed to set pieces defensively.
Conceded per Match Average set-piece goals conceded per match.
vs Expected (xGA) Goals conceded minus set-piece xGA. Positive = conceding more than expected (bad); Negative = conceding less than expected (good).
vs
xG set-piece data unavailable for both teams. Values estimated using proxy metrics (shots, dangerous attacks). Confidence: Medium.
Kidlington
Larkhall Athletic
xG Share = set-piece xG ÷ total xG
vs Expected = goals − set-piece xG

Counter / Transition Attack & Defence

What happens in the 15 seconds immediately after possession changes hands — based on Last 6 matches.

Kidlington
vs
Larkhall Athletic
Attack After Winning Possession transition → offence
Kidlington Larkhall Athletic
Goals per Match Average goals scored within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
Shots per Match Average shots taken within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
Dangerous Attacks Average dangerous attacks launched within 15s of winning possession per match. ↑ better
Defence After Losing Possession loss → defensive exposure
Kidlington Larkhall Athletic
Goals Conceded Average goals conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
Shots Conceded Average shots conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
Dangerous Attacks Conceded Average dangerous attacks allowed within 15s of losing possession per match. ↓ better
Kidlington
Larkhall Athletic
Window = 15s post-possession change
Index = 0–1 composite score
Pressure Index data not available for this match.

General Information

Date & Time
Competition
2026/2027 FA Cup, England · Extra Preliminary Round
Stadium
Yarnton Road
Capacity
1500
Pitch Surface
Grass
Weather
☀️ 12°C, Fair

Squad

Squad

Hamza Al Jabari
Hamza Al Jabari Midfielder

Squad

Chris Humphries
Chris Humphries Goalkeeper
Shaun Semmens
Shaun Semmens Goalkeeper
Tom Warren
Tom Warren Defender
Jack Goodall
Jack Goodall Defender
Josh Jones
Josh Jones Defender
Dan Restorick
Dan Restorick Defender
Fin Coyle
Fin Coyle Defender
Leon Greenland
Leon Greenland Defender
Jay Malpas
Jay Malpas Midfielder
Daniel Demkiv
Daniel Demkiv Midfielder
Tom Fry
Tom Fry Midfielder
Dale Evans
Dale Evans Midfielder
Brad Norris
Brad Norris Midfielder
Alex Lambert
Alex Lambert Midfielder
Joe Hillard
Joe Hillard Midfielder
Carly Bryant
Carly Bryant Midfielder
Katie German
Katie German Midfielder
Matt Britton
Matt Britton Midfielder
Harry Simons
Harry Simons Midfielder
Geraint Bater
Geraint Bater Midfielder

CONCLUSION

Final score detail: Kidlington 1-3 Larkhall Athletic. Structural assessment: Larkhall Athletic exhibited a significant deviation from the pre-match structural baseline. Efficiency outcome: Possession-adjusted chance creation finished in line with projected levels. Result alignment: The final score was consistent with the pre-match probability model. Market alignment: The match result was within the projected probability range.