Match in progress now LIVE Real-time updates

Hungerford Town vs Wokingham Town preview

England flag 2026/2027 FA Cup, England
Bulpit Lane
FA Cup
Hungerford TownHUN
0 – 1
1ST HALF 47 +1'
Wokingham TownWOTO5
Live : 1st Half
Preliminary Round
|
Goal
Unknown - 36'

Events

1ST-HALF
36'
Event
1st Goal

Statistics

Possession
HUN
0%
WOTO5
100%

Top Statistics

0 Goals 1

Squad

Squad ▼

—
Ryan Clarke
Ryan Clarke Goalkeeper
—
Rob Brown
Rob Brown Goalkeeper
—
Rhys Tyler
Rhys Tyler Defender
—
Ramarni Medford-Smith
Ramarni Medford-Smith Defender
—
Matt Berry-Hargreaves
Matt Berry-Hargreaves Defender
—
Baboucarr Jarra
Baboucarr Jarra Defender
—
Jack Stanley
Jack Stanley Defender
—
Luke Softley
Luke Softley Defender
—
Mike Baker
Mike Baker Defender
—
Jack Wright
Jack Wright Defender
—
Jack Alexander
Jack Alexander Midfielder
—
Brad Hooper
Brad Hooper Midfielder
—
Sam De St. Croix
Sam De St. Croix Midfielder
—
George Smith
George Smith Midfielder
—
Joseph Shepherd
Joseph Shepherd Midfielder
—
Owain Wheeler
Owain Wheeler Midfielder

Squad ▼

No data available

CONTEXT

The game is in first half around minute 45, with Hungerford Town and Wokingham Town in live competition. Wokingham Town hold the on-field advantage so far, which reads as diverging with the pre-match structural expectation led by Hungerford Town.

TL;DR

  • Live state: At the 45th minute of the first half Wokingham Town holds qualitative control through sustained pressure and organized transitions.
  • Structural vs live: Live leadership by Wokingham Town diverges from pre-match signals that identified Hungerford Town as the stronger side.
  • Projection vs live: Neutral alignment exists between projections and live events with observable divergence in team dominance.
  • xG trend: xG data is unavailable yet efficiency remains in line with pre-match expectations for both sides.
  • Possession profile: Possession metrics are unavailable but qualitative control favors Wokingham Town in the first half.
  • Event impact: No red cards have occurred and events have stayed in line with expected efficiency patterns.
  • Second-half outlook: Live efficiency trend is in line with; The next phase depends on whether Wokingham Town can sustain control without conceding high-value chances.
No standings statistics available.
No head-to-head records found.
0.5+ goals: 85%
1.5+ goals: 70%
2.5+ goals: 50%
3.5+ goals: 25%
Confidence: High (≥8 matches)

Quality vs Volume

Home: xG 1.8, Shots 12, xG/Shot 0.15
Away: xG 1.5, Shots 14, xG/Shot 0.11

Open Play vs Set Play

Open Play: 65%
Set Play: 35%

Expected Points

TeamxPts
Home1.8
Away1.2
ℹ️ Methodology: Expected Goals (xG) measures shot quality
No referee statistics available.
Hungerford Town D. Robinson
D. Robinson
VS
Wokingham Town Wokingham Town
Wokingham Town
0
Avg Points / Game (Last 100 Matches)
0
0 i
Avg Points / Game (Last 6 Matches)
0 i
Last 6 Opponents
Corsham Town Rank: L
0
Head to Head (Wins - Draws - Losses)
0 - 0 - 0
0

Team Power Ranking

i
What is Power Ranking?
Power score: composite of opponent-weighted form (last 6 & 20 games) and league position over last 3 seasons.
50
50
0 (Weakest) 100 (Strongest)
Metric
Hungerford Town
Wokingham Town
Power Score
50
50
League Position
-
-
Global Rank
-
-

Form Analysis Opponent-Weighted

Line chart of recent results (points/trend). Friendlies excluded by default. Hover for opponent, result, xG/xGA and power ranking — based on last 6 matches.

–
vs
Hungerford Town — Opponent-weighted form score
Wokingham Town — Opponent-weighted form score
Win (3 pts) Draw (1 pt) Loss (0 pts) Hungerford Town Wokingham Town

Heatmaps Ball coordinates

Attack and defence zones from ball position data. Filters: last 6 matches (overall/home/away), time period, competition.

–
vs

Hungerford Town

Left / Center / Right —
Opposition half density —
vs season average —

Wokingham Town

Left / Center / Right —
Opposition half density —
vs season average —
Possession Efficiency data not available for this match.

Set Pieces Efficiency Attack & Defence

Set-piece reliance and strength using expected metrics and actual outcomes for each team.

Hungerford Town ⚠ Proxy
vs
⚠ Proxy Wokingham Town
Created Set-piece attacking threat
Hungerford Town Wokingham Town
Set-piece xG Share Share of total expected goals generated from set pieces. Higher = more set-piece reliant in attack.
—
—
Goals per Match Average set-piece goals scored per match.
0.00 0.00
vs Expected (xG) Goals scored minus set-piece xG. Positive = overperforming; Negative = underperforming expectations.
— vs —
Conceded Set-piece defensive exposure
Hungerford Town Wokingham Town
Set-piece xGA Share Share of total expected goals conceded from set pieces. Higher = more exposed to set pieces defensively.
—
—
Conceded per Match Average set-piece goals conceded per match.
0.00 0.00
vs Expected (xGA) Goals conceded minus set-piece xGA. Positive = conceding more than expected (bad); Negative = conceding less than expected (good).
— vs —
xG set-piece data unavailable for both teams. Values estimated using proxy metrics (shots, dangerous attacks). Confidence: Medium.
Hungerford Town
Wokingham Town
xG Share = set-piece xG ÷ total xG
vs Expected = goals − set-piece xG

Counter / Transition Attack & Defence

What happens in the 15 seconds immediately after possession changes hands — based on Last 6 matches.

–
Hungerford Town
vs
Wokingham Town
Attack After Winning Possession transition → offence
Hungerford Town Wokingham Town
Goals per Match Average goals scored within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
—
—
Shots per Match Average shots taken within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
—
—
Dangerous Attacks Average dangerous attacks launched within 15s of winning possession per match. ↑ better
—
—
Transition Efficiency Index Composite score (0–1) of how efficiently this team attacks within 15s of winning the ball. Higher = more dangerous on transition. Higher = stronger on the counter
Hungerford Town 0.00
Wokingham Town 0.00
Defence After Losing Possession loss → defensive exposure
Hungerford Town Wokingham Town
Goals Conceded Average goals conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
—
—
Shots Conceded Average shots conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
—
—
Dangerous Attacks Conceded Average dangerous attacks allowed within 15s of losing possession per match. ↓ better
—
—
Vulnerability Index Composite score (0–1) of how exposed this team is within 15s of losing the ball. Lower = better at preventing transition attacks. Lower = better transition defence
Hungerford Town —
Wokingham Town 0.00
Hungerford Town
Wokingham Town
Window = 15s post-possession change
Index = 0–1 composite score
Pressure Index data not available for this match.

General Information

Date & Time
Competition
2026/2027 FA Cup, England · Preliminary Round
Stadium
Bulpit Lane
Capacity
2500
Pitch Surface
Grass
Weather
☀️ 12°C, Fair

CONCLUSION

At this live stage, the run of play and underlying metrics suggest a diverging path versus pre-match expectations. Projection alignment is neutral, while efficiency indicators are in line with. The next phase depends on whether Wokingham Town can sustain control without conceding high-value chances.