Haringey Borough vs Frenford preview

England flag 2026/2027 FA Cup, England
Coles Park
FA Cup
Full Time
Preliminary Round

CONTEXT

Haringey Borough hosted Frenford in a match that ended 2-2. The first half concluded at 0-0 with both teams level at the interval. Haringey Borough entered as the stronger side yet the final outcome showed a significant deviation from projected results. No red cards were shown to either team and the game maintained an even structure without major interruptions. Expected goals figures and possession statistics remained unavailable for analysis. The second half produced all four goals as the sides traded strikes to reach the draw. Efficiency metrics aligned with the observed pattern of play throughout the contest. The result reflected a balanced encounter despite the pre-match assessment favoring the home side.

TL;DR

  • Structural deviation: Final score: Haringey Borough 2-2 Frenford. Haringey Borough showed a significant deviation from the pre-match structural baseline.
  • Efficiency shift: The efficiency shift remained in line with the match dynamics.
  • xG alignment: Expected goals data was unavailable to determine alignment.
  • Market alignment: The outcome aligned with pre-match projections.
  • xG expectations: No xG data existed to assess expectations.
  • Event impact: No disruptive events altered the final scoreline.
  • Red card distortion: Absence of red cards produced no distortion to game flow.
No standings statistics available.
No head-to-head records found.
0.5+ goals: 85%
1.5+ goals: 70%
2.5+ goals: 50%
3.5+ goals: 25%
Confidence: High (≥8 matches)

Quality vs Volume

Home: xG 1.8, Shots 12, xG/Shot 0.15
Away: xG 1.5, Shots 14, xG/Shot 0.11

Open Play vs Set Play

Open Play: 65%
Set Play: 35%

Expected Points

TeamxPts
Home1.8
Away1.2
ℹ️ Methodology: Expected Goals (xG) measures shot quality
No referee statistics available.
Haringey Borough Haringey Borough
Haringey Borough
VS
Frenford Frenford
Frenford
3
Avg Points / Game (Last 100 Matches)
3
3 i
Last 6 Opponents
Sporting Bengal United Rank: W
Avg Points / Game (Last 6 Matches)
3 i
Last 6 Opponents
Harlow Town Rank: W
0
Head to Head (Wins - Draws - Losses)
0 - 0 - 0
0

Team Power Ranking

i
What is Power Ranking?
Power score: composite of opponent-weighted form (last 6 & 20 games) and league position over last 3 seasons.
50
50
0 (Weakest) 100 (Strongest)
Metric
Haringey Borough
Frenford
Power Score
50
50
League Position
-
-
Global Rank
-
-

Form Analysis Opponent-Weighted

Line chart of recent results (points/trend). Friendlies excluded by default. Hover for opponent, result, xG/xGA and power ranking — based on last 6 matches.

vs
Haringey Borough Opponent-weighted form score
Frenford Opponent-weighted form score
Win (3 pts) Draw (1 pt) Loss (0 pts) Haringey Borough Frenford

Heatmaps Ball coordinates

Attack and defence zones from ball position data. Filters: last 6 matches (overall/home/away), time period, competition.

vs

Haringey Borough

Left / Center / Right
Opposition half density
vs season average

Frenford

Left / Center / Right
Opposition half density
vs season average
Possession Efficiency data not available for this match.

Set Pieces Efficiency Attack & Defence

Set-piece reliance and strength using expected metrics and actual outcomes for each team.

Haringey Borough ⚠ Proxy
vs
⚠ Proxy Frenford
Created Set-piece attacking threat
Haringey Borough Frenford
Set-piece xG Share Share of total expected goals generated from set pieces. Higher = more set-piece reliant in attack.
Goals per Match Average set-piece goals scored per match.
vs Expected (xG) Goals scored minus set-piece xG. Positive = overperforming; Negative = underperforming expectations.
vs
Conceded Set-piece defensive exposure
Haringey Borough Frenford
Set-piece xGA Share Share of total expected goals conceded from set pieces. Higher = more exposed to set pieces defensively.
Conceded per Match Average set-piece goals conceded per match.
vs Expected (xGA) Goals conceded minus set-piece xGA. Positive = conceding more than expected (bad); Negative = conceding less than expected (good).
vs
xG set-piece data unavailable for both teams. Values estimated using proxy metrics (shots, dangerous attacks). Confidence: Medium.
Haringey Borough
Frenford
xG Share = set-piece xG ÷ total xG
vs Expected = goals − set-piece xG

Counter / Transition Attack & Defence

What happens in the 15 seconds immediately after possession changes hands — based on Last 6 matches.

Haringey Borough
vs
Frenford
Attack After Winning Possession transition → offence
Haringey Borough Frenford
Goals per Match Average goals scored within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
Shots per Match Average shots taken within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
Dangerous Attacks Average dangerous attacks launched within 15s of winning possession per match. ↑ better
Defence After Losing Possession loss → defensive exposure
Haringey Borough Frenford
Goals Conceded Average goals conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
Shots Conceded Average shots conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
Dangerous Attacks Conceded Average dangerous attacks allowed within 15s of losing possession per match. ↓ better
Haringey Borough
Frenford
Window = 15s post-possession change
Index = 0–1 composite score
Pressure Index data not available for this match.

General Information

Date & Time
Competition
2026/2027 FA Cup, England · Preliminary Round
Stadium
Coles Park
Capacity
2500
Pitch Surface
Grass
Weather
☀️ 12°C, Fair

Squad

Squad

Scott Mitchell
Scott Mitchell Defender
J'Ardell Stirling
J'Ardell Stirling Defender
Georgios Aresti
Georgios Aresti Midfielder
Jorge Djessi-Sambu
Jorge Djessi-Sambu Midfielder
Rakim Richards
Rakim Richards Midfielder
Dimitri Nicolaou
Dimitri Nicolaou Midfielder

Squad

No data available

CONCLUSION

The 2-2 draw highlighted a competitive balance between Haringey Borough and Frenford after a scoreless opening period. All goals arrived in the second half as each team responded to the other. Haringey Borough as the stronger side failed to secure the win amid the noted deviation. Lack of red cards allowed uninterrupted play across both halves. Without xG or possession data the assessment relies on the observed score progression and efficiency alignment. The result demonstrated how second half adjustments can equalize an encounter. Both teams contributed to the final tally through direct responses to concessions. This outcome underscores the variability possible even when one side holds pre-match favor.