Chasetown vs Coton Green FC preview

England flag 2026/2027 FA Cup, England
The Scholars Ground
FA Cup
ChasetownCFC
6 1
Coton Green FCCOGR
Full Time
Extra Preliminary Round

CONTEXT

Chasetown faced Coton Green FC and secured a 6-1 win with the scoreline reflecting a complete second half turnaround after a goalless first half. Both sides started evenly matched and created limited clear opportunities before the interval. Chasetown then increased their tempo and accuracy after the break to score six times while restricting the visitors to a single goal. The stronger team maintained control throughout the second period without any disciplinary issues arising on either side. Possession and chance creation favored Chasetown substantially after halftime leading to the lopsided result. The outcome showed a significant deviation from the balanced opening phase. No expected goals figures were recorded yet the final margin aligned with the stronger side prevailing.

TL;DR

  • Structural deviation: Chasetown recorded a significant structural deviation from the even first half performance.
  • Efficiency shift: The efficiency shift remained in line with the stronger team after the interval.
  • xG alignment: No expected goals data was available to assess alignment with the 6-1 score.
  • Market alignment: The final result stayed aligned with pre-match indicators for the stronger side.
  • xG expectations: Expected goals values were not recorded for either Chasetown or Coton Green FC.
  • Event impact: The second half adjustments produced the decisive 6-1 outcome after a 0-0 halftime.
  • Red card distortion: No red cards occurred so match dynamics experienced no disciplinary distortion.
No standings statistics available.
No head-to-head records found.
0.5+ goals: 85%
1.5+ goals: 70%
2.5+ goals: 50%
3.5+ goals: 25%
Confidence: High (≥8 matches)

Quality vs Volume

Home: xG 1.8, Shots 12, xG/Shot 0.15
Away: xG 1.5, Shots 14, xG/Shot 0.11

Open Play vs Set Play

Open Play: 65%
Set Play: 35%

Expected Points

TeamxPts
Home1.8
Away1.2
ℹ️ Methodology: Expected Goals (xG) measures shot quality
No referee statistics available.
Chasetown Chasetown
Chasetown
VS
Coton Green FC Coton Green FC
Coton Green FC
0
Avg Points / Game (Last 100 Matches)
0
0 i
Avg Points / Game (Last 6 Matches)
0 i
0
Head to Head (Wins - Draws - Losses)
0 - 0 - 0
0

Team Power Ranking

i
What is Power Ranking?
Power score: composite of opponent-weighted form (last 6 & 20 games) and league position over last 3 seasons.
50
50
0 (Weakest) 100 (Strongest)
Metric
Chasetown
Coton Green FC
Power Score
50
50
League Position
-
-
Global Rank
-
-

Form Analysis Opponent-Weighted

Line chart of recent results (points/trend). Friendlies excluded by default. Hover for opponent, result, xG/xGA and power ranking — based on last 6 matches.

–
vs
Chasetown — Opponent-weighted form score
Coton Green FC — Opponent-weighted form score
Win (3 pts) Draw (1 pt) Loss (0 pts) Chasetown Coton Green FC

Heatmaps Ball coordinates

Attack and defence zones from ball position data. Filters: last 6 matches (overall/home/away), time period, competition.

–
vs

Chasetown

Left / Center / Right —
Opposition half density —
vs season average —

Coton Green FC

Left / Center / Right —
Opposition half density —
vs season average —
Possession Efficiency data not available for this match.

Set Pieces Efficiency Attack & Defence

Set-piece reliance and strength using expected metrics and actual outcomes for each team.

Chasetown ⚠ Proxy
vs
⚠ Proxy Coton Green FC
Created Set-piece attacking threat
Chasetown Coton Green FC
Set-piece xG Share Share of total expected goals generated from set pieces. Higher = more set-piece reliant in attack.
—
—
Goals per Match Average set-piece goals scored per match.
— —
vs Expected (xG) Goals scored minus set-piece xG. Positive = overperforming; Negative = underperforming expectations.
— vs —
Conceded Set-piece defensive exposure
Chasetown Coton Green FC
Set-piece xGA Share Share of total expected goals conceded from set pieces. Higher = more exposed to set pieces defensively.
—
—
Conceded per Match Average set-piece goals conceded per match.
— —
vs Expected (xGA) Goals conceded minus set-piece xGA. Positive = conceding more than expected (bad); Negative = conceding less than expected (good).
— vs —
xG set-piece data unavailable for both teams. Values estimated using proxy metrics (shots, dangerous attacks). Confidence: Medium.
Chasetown
Coton Green FC
xG Share = set-piece xG ÷ total xG
vs Expected = goals − set-piece xG

Counter / Transition Attack & Defence

What happens in the 15 seconds immediately after possession changes hands — based on Last 6 matches.

–
Chasetown
vs
Coton Green FC
Attack After Winning Possession transition → offence
Chasetown Coton Green FC
Goals per Match Average goals scored within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
—
—
Shots per Match Average shots taken within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
—
—
Dangerous Attacks Average dangerous attacks launched within 15s of winning possession per match. ↑ better
—
—
Transition Efficiency Index Composite score (0–1) of how efficiently this team attacks within 15s of winning the ball. Higher = more dangerous on transition. Higher = stronger on the counter
Chasetown 0.00
Coton Green FC 0.00
Defence After Losing Possession loss → defensive exposure
Chasetown Coton Green FC
Goals Conceded Average goals conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
—
—
Shots Conceded Average shots conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
—
—
Dangerous Attacks Conceded Average dangerous attacks allowed within 15s of losing possession per match. ↓ better
—
—
Vulnerability Index Composite score (0–1) of how exposed this team is within 15s of losing the ball. Lower = better at preventing transition attacks. Lower = better transition defence
Chasetown 0.00
Coton Green FC 0.00
Chasetown
Coton Green FC
Window = 15s post-possession change
Index = 0–1 composite score
Pressure Index data not available for this match.

General Information

Date & Time
Competition
2026/2027 FA Cup, England · Extra Preliminary Round
Stadium
The Scholars Ground
Capacity
2000
Pitch Surface
Grass
Weather
☀️ 12°C, Fair

CONCLUSION

The 6-1 result confirmed Chasetown as the dominant side once they adjusted their approach after the even opening period. Coton Green FC competed evenly until halftime but lacked the resources to respond once the home team accelerated their attacking output. All goals arrived in the second half underscoring the importance of tactical adjustments at the break. Absence of red cards allowed both teams to maintain their intended formations without forced changes. The significant deviation in performance metrics after the interval produced the final margin without reliance on external factors. Chasetown executed their game plan effectively to convert opportunities while limiting the visitors to minimal output. This outcome highlighted the stronger team's capacity to control proceedings over ninety minutes once momentum shifted.