Boldmere St Michaels vs Chasetown preview

England flag 2026/2027 FA Cup, England
FA Cup
Boldmere St MichaelsBSM
1 0
ChasetownCFC
Full Time
Preliminary Round

CONTEXT

In a match that showcased defensive solidity, Boldmere St Michaels emerged victorious against Chasetown with a final score of 1-0. The first half concluded without any goals as both teams canceled each other out effectively. The breakthrough came after the interval when the home side capitalized on their opportunities to secure the win. Boldmere, identified as the stronger team, maintained control in key phases despite limited possession data being available. Chasetown pressed forward in search of an equalizer but were unable to breach the defense. The absence of red cards ensured a full complement of players on the pitch for the duration. This outcome reflects the competitive balance in the fixture while highlighting Boldmere's ability to grind out results in challenging environments. The significant deviation noted in the performance metrics underscores the unexpected efficiency displayed by the victors.

TL;DR

  • Structural deviation: Boldmere St Michaels exhibited a significant structural deviation of 100 percent in their performance.
  • Efficiency shift: The efficiency shift was in line with expectations for the stronger team.
  • xG alignment: No xG data was available to determine alignment with the match outcome.
  • Market alignment: The result was aligned with pre-match market indicators.
  • xG expectations: Expected goals could not be evaluated due to the absence of relevant statistics.
  • Event impact: The second half goal proved decisive in determining the 1-0 victory.
  • Red card distortion: No red cards were issued, resulting in no distortion to the match dynamics.
No standings statistics available.
No head-to-head records found.
0.5+ goals: 85%
1.5+ goals: 70%
2.5+ goals: 50%
3.5+ goals: 25%
Confidence: High (≥8 matches)

Quality vs Volume

Home: xG 1.8, Shots 12, xG/Shot 0.15
Away: xG 1.5, Shots 14, xG/Shot 0.11

Open Play vs Set Play

Open Play: 65%
Set Play: 35%

Expected Points

TeamxPts
Home1.8
Away1.2
ℹ️ Methodology: Expected Goals (xG) measures shot quality
No referee statistics available.
Boldmere St Michaels Boldmere St Michaels
Boldmere St Michaels
VS
Chasetown Chasetown
Chasetown
3
Avg Points / Game (Last 100 Matches)
3
3 i
Last 6 Opponents
Gresley Rank: W
Avg Points / Game (Last 6 Matches)
3 i
Last 6 Opponents
Coton Green FC Rank: W
0
Head to Head (Wins - Draws - Losses)
0 - 0 - 0
0

Team Power Ranking

i
What is Power Ranking?
Power score: composite of opponent-weighted form (last 6 & 20 games) and league position over last 3 seasons.
50
50
0 (Weakest) 100 (Strongest)
Metric
Boldmere St Michaels
Chasetown
Power Score
50
50
League Position
-
-
Global Rank
-
-

Form Analysis Opponent-Weighted

Line chart of recent results (points/trend). Friendlies excluded by default. Hover for opponent, result, xG/xGA and power ranking — based on last 6 matches.

–
vs
Boldmere St Michaels — Opponent-weighted form score
Chasetown — Opponent-weighted form score
Win (3 pts) Draw (1 pt) Loss (0 pts) Boldmere St Michaels Chasetown

Heatmaps Ball coordinates

Attack and defence zones from ball position data. Filters: last 6 matches (overall/home/away), time period, competition.

–
vs

Boldmere St Michaels

Left / Center / Right —
Opposition half density —
vs season average —

Chasetown

Left / Center / Right —
Opposition half density —
vs season average —
Possession Efficiency data not available for this match.

Set Pieces Efficiency Attack & Defence

Set-piece reliance and strength using expected metrics and actual outcomes for each team.

Boldmere St Michaels ⚠ Proxy
vs
⚠ Proxy Chasetown
Created Set-piece attacking threat
Boldmere St Michaels Chasetown
Set-piece xG Share Share of total expected goals generated from set pieces. Higher = more set-piece reliant in attack.
—
—
Goals per Match Average set-piece goals scored per match.
0.00 0.00
vs Expected (xG) Goals scored minus set-piece xG. Positive = overperforming; Negative = underperforming expectations.
— vs —
Conceded Set-piece defensive exposure
Boldmere St Michaels Chasetown
Set-piece xGA Share Share of total expected goals conceded from set pieces. Higher = more exposed to set pieces defensively.
—
—
Conceded per Match Average set-piece goals conceded per match.
0.00 0.00
vs Expected (xGA) Goals conceded minus set-piece xGA. Positive = conceding more than expected (bad); Negative = conceding less than expected (good).
— vs —
xG set-piece data unavailable for both teams. Values estimated using proxy metrics (shots, dangerous attacks). Confidence: Medium.
Boldmere St Michaels
Chasetown
xG Share = set-piece xG ÷ total xG
vs Expected = goals − set-piece xG

Counter / Transition Attack & Defence

What happens in the 15 seconds immediately after possession changes hands — based on Last 6 matches.

–
Boldmere St Michaels
vs
Chasetown
Attack After Winning Possession transition → offence
Boldmere St Michaels Chasetown
Goals per Match Average goals scored within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
—
—
Shots per Match Average shots taken within 15s of winning the ball per match. ↑ better
—
—
Dangerous Attacks Average dangerous attacks launched within 15s of winning possession per match. ↑ better
—
—
Transition Efficiency Index Composite score (0–1) of how efficiently this team attacks within 15s of winning the ball. Higher = more dangerous on transition. Higher = stronger on the counter
Boldmere St Michaels 0.00
Chasetown 0.00
Defence After Losing Possession loss → defensive exposure
Boldmere St Michaels Chasetown
Goals Conceded Average goals conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
—
—
Shots Conceded Average shots conceded within 15s of losing the ball per match. ↓ better
—
—
Dangerous Attacks Conceded Average dangerous attacks allowed within 15s of losing possession per match. ↓ better
—
—
Vulnerability Index Composite score (0–1) of how exposed this team is within 15s of losing the ball. Lower = better at preventing transition attacks. Lower = better transition defence
Boldmere St Michaels 0.00
Chasetown 0.00
Boldmere St Michaels
Chasetown
Window = 15s post-possession change
Index = 0–1 composite score
Pressure Index data not available for this match.

General Information

Date & Time
Competition
2026/2027 FA Cup, England · Preliminary Round
Stadium
,
Capacity
N/A
Pitch Surface
N/A
Weather
☀️ 12°C, Fair

Statistics

Possession
BSM
100%
CFC
0%

Top Statistics

1 Goals 0

Squad

Squad ▼

No data available

Squad ▼

—
Matt Sargeant
Matt Sargeant Goalkeeper
—
Curtis Pond
Curtis Pond Goalkeeper
—
Kieran Fenton
Kieran Fenton Defender
—
Maxwell Chimenes
Maxwell Chimenes Defender
—
Mitchell Clarke
Mitchell Clarke Defender
—
Kris Taylor
Kris Taylor Midfielder
—
Sam Griffiths
Sam Griffiths Midfielder
—
Danny O'Callaghan
Danny O'Callaghan Midfielder
—
Samuel Wilding
Samuel Wilding Midfielder
—
Jack Langston
Jack Langston Midfielder
—
George Cater
George Cater Midfielder
—
Joe Thompson
Joe Thompson Midfielder
—
Joey Buckley
Joey Buckley
—
Lewi Burnside
Lewi Burnside
—
Jordan Evans
Jordan Evans
—
Kai Cunningham
Kai Cunningham
—
Oliver Hayward
Oliver Hayward
—
Benjamin Lund
Benjamin Lund

Match Commentary

CONCLUSION

The victory for Boldmere St Michaels against Chasetown by 1-0 highlights effective second-half execution after a scoreless opening period. The home side's ability to maintain composure and deliver the winning goal proved crucial in overcoming a resilient opponent. With no red cards disrupting proceedings, the contest remained balanced until the end. Efficiency levels stayed consistent with the pre-match stronger team designation, leading to a deserved result. This success bolsters Boldmere's position and sets a foundation for continued progress in their schedule. Chasetown showed determination but lacked the cutting edge needed to alter the scoreline. Such matches underscore the value of clinical finishing.