Auda vs FCSB preview

Europe flag 2026/2027 Europa Conference League, Europe
Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs Today - 4:00 PM
Europa Conference League
Auda AUD
FCSB FSB
KICKOFF : Today - 4:00 PM
2nd Qualifying Round Leg 2 of 2 Aggregate : 3 - 2

CONTEXT

Auda welcome FCSB to Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs for the second leg of their Europa Conference League second qualifying round tie. The Latvian hosts hold a 3-2 aggregate advantage after claiming a 3-2 victory in the first leg away from home. Both sides enter with identical power scores of 50, though Auda is listed as the stronger team overall. Form metrics show Auda at 50 while FCSB registers 0, setting up an intriguing contrast in recent momentum. The match represents a key European night for Auda on home soil against a side that will look to overturn the deficit. Limited underlying data leaves several areas reliant on proxy indicators, yet the aggregate lead gives Auda a platform to manage proceedings carefully.

TL;DR

  • Structural: Both teams show balanced structures with equal power scores of 50.
  • Form: Auda holds a form score of 50 compared to FCSB at 0.
  • Squad: Auda is identified as the stronger squad in this matchup.
  • Efficiency: Efficiency metrics remain unavailable for both teams.
  • Transition: Transition data is not provided in available inputs.
  • Set pieces: Set piece information shows low confidence and proxy usage.
  • xVariable: Power balance stands even at 50 points each.
  • Market: Auda 18.5% (Δ+0%) | Draw 22.8% (Δ+0%) | FCSB 58.7% (Δ+0%).
No standings statistics available.
No head-to-head records found.
0.5+ goals: 85%
1.5+ goals: 70%
2.5+ goals: 50%
3.5+ goals: 25%
Confidence: High (≥8 matches)

Quality vs Volume

Home: xG 1.8, Shots 12, xG/Shot 0.15
Away: xG 1.5, Shots 14, xG/Shot 0.11

Open Play vs Set Play

Open Play: 65%
Set Play: 35%

Expected Points

TeamxPts
Home1.8
Away1.2
ℹ️ Methodology: Expected Goals (xG) measures shot quality
Jan 25 vs Team A
Feb 1 vs Team B
Feb 8 vs Team C
Auda D. Zanetti
D. Zanetti
VS
FCSB M. Baciu
M. Baciu
3
Avg Points / Game (Last 100 Matches)
0
3 i
Last 6 Opponents
FCSB Rank: 68 W
Avg Points / Game (Last 6 Matches)
0 i
Last 6 Opponents
Auda Rank: L
1
Head to Head (Wins - Draws - Losses)
1 - 0 - 0
0
No sidelined player data available.

Win Probabilities

Live Win Probability (90 Min)
Home Auda
18.53%
Draw
22.8%
Away FCSB
58.67%

Team Power Ranking

i
What is Power Ranking?
Power score: composite of opponent-weighted form (last 6 & 20 games) and league position over last 3 seasons.
50
50
0 (Weakest) 100 (Strongest)
Metric
Auda
FCSB
Power Score
50
50
League Position
-
-
Global Rank
-
-

Form Analysis Opponent-Weighted

Line chart of recent results (points/trend). Friendlies excluded by default. Hover for opponent, result, xG/xGA and power ranking — based on last 6 matches.

vs
Auda Opponent-weighted form score
FCSB Opponent-weighted form score
Win (3 pts) Draw (1 pt) Loss (0 pts) Auda FCSB

Team Head to Head Last 6 Seasons

Summary of 1 match between these sides — filtered by competition and venue context.

Auda AUD Home
1 matches
FCSB FSB Away
Match Record
1
Wins
0
0
Draws
0
0
Losses
1
Goals
3
Goals Scored
2
2
Goals Conceded
3
+1
Goal Difference
-1
Expected Goals
0
xG
0
0
xGA
0

Data last updated: 2026-07-28T00:06:32+00:00

General Information

Date & Time
Jul 30, 2026, 04:00 PM
Competition
2026/2027 Europa Conference League, Europe · 2nd Qualifying Round · Leg 2 of 2 · Aggregate : 3 - 2
Stadium
Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs
Capacity
8207
Pitch Surface
Artificial turf
Weather
☀️ 12°C, Fair
Referees
Tom Owen
Johnathan Bryant
Lewiss Edwards
Alex McInch

Squad

Referee : Tom Owen

Squad

98
Nils Toms Puriņš
Nils Toms Puriņš Goalkeeper
29
Niks Daniels Aleksandrovs
Niks Daniels Aleksandrovs Goalkeeper
1
Raivo Stūriņš
Raivo Stūriņš Goalkeeper
2
Tin Hrvoj
Tin Hrvoj Defender
80
Sebastián Alexandre Aranda Vallumbrosio
Sebastián Alexandre Aranda Vallumbrosio Defender
6
Ralfs Kragliks
Ralfs Kragliks Defender
4
Moussa Ouedraogo
Moussa Ouedraogo Defender
77
Jevgenijs  Miņins
Jevgenijs Miņins Midfielder
10
Wally Fofana
Wally Fofana Midfielder
8
Edvin Bongemba
Edvin Bongemba Midfielder
18
Ariel Arroyo
Ariel Arroyo Midfielder
14
Hussaini Ibrahim
Hussaini Ibrahim Midfielder
20
Youba Traore
Youba Traore Midfielder
71
Oskars Rubenis
Oskars Rubenis Attacker
17
Eduards Daskevics
Eduards Daskevics Attacker
25
Barthélémy Diedhiou
Barthélémy Diedhiou Attacker
46
Jayen Gerold
Jayen Gerold Attacker
26
Hãnoc Lusweki
Hãnoc Lusweki Attacker
47
Kader Kone
Kader Kone Attacker
23
Mohamoud Fofana
Mohamoud Fofana Attacker
40
Andrews Appiah
Andrews Appiah Attacker
Referee : Tom Owen

Squad

32
Ștefan Târnovanu
Ștefan Târnovanu Goalkeeper
34
Mihai Răzvan Udrea
Mihai Răzvan Udrea Goalkeeper
13
Matei Popa
Matei Popa Goalkeeper
2
Valentin Iulian Crețu
Valentin Iulian Crețu Defender
33
Risto Radunović
Risto Radunović Defender
17
Mihai Popescu
Mihai Popescu Defender
30
Siyabonga Ngezana
Siyabonga Ngezana Defender
3
André Lourenço Duarte
André Lourenço Duarte Defender
97
Ronny Labonne
Ronny Labonne Defender
5
Joyskim Dawa
Joyskim Dawa Defender
Laurențiu Constantin Vlăsceanu
Laurențiu Constantin Vlăsceanu Defender
4
Ricardo Padurariu
Ricardo Padurariu Defender
6
Andrei Dăncuș
Andrei Dăncuș Defender
15
Ofri Arad
Ofri Arad Midfielder
8
Eddy Gnahoré
Eddy Gnahoré Midfielder
31
Juri Cisotti
Juri Cisotti Midfielder
10
Florin Lucian Tănase
Florin Lucian Tănase Midfielder
18
João Paulo Moreira Fernandes
João Paulo Moreira Fernandes Midfielder
16
Mihai Daniel Lixandru
Mihai Daniel Lixandru Midfielder
22
Mihai Toma
Mihai Toma Midfielder
11
David Raul Miculescu
David Raul Miculescu Attacker
20
Dennis Politic
Dennis Politic Attacker
9
Daniel Birligea
Daniel Birligea Attacker
28
Aymen Boutoutaou
Aymen Boutoutaou Attacker
7
Octavian Popescu
Octavian Popescu Attacker
90
Alexandru Constantin Stoian
Alexandru Constantin Stoian Attacker
98
David Popa
David Popa Attacker

CONCLUSION

Auda enters the second leg with a narrow aggregate lead and the comfort of playing at home, where they can dictate tempo and look to protect their advantage. FCSB must find a way to score while managing defensive risks, given their lower form indicators. The equal power scores suggest a competitive encounter where small details could decide progression. With sparse efficiency and set piece data, much will depend on in-game execution and adaptability. Auda's platform allows for measured control, yet FCSB retains the quality to challenge if they exploit transitions effectively. The outcome will hinge on how both sides handle the pressure of the two-legged tie.